مشخصات مقاله:
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
جسارت روانی: خودشیفتگی، عزت نفس یا چیزی در بین آن دو؟
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Psychopathic boldness: Narcissism, self-esteem, or something in between?
کلمات کلیدی مقاله:
جسارت، تسلط بی باک، اختلالات فکری و روانیف اعتماد به نفس، خودشیفتگی
مناسب برای رشته های دانشگاهی زیر:
روانشناسی
مناسب برای گرایش های دانشگاهی زیر:
روانشناسی عمومی
وضعیت مقاله انگلیسی و ترجمه:
مقاله انگلیسی را میتوانید به صورت رایگان با فرمت PDF با کلیک بر روی دکمه آبی، دانلود نمایید. برای ثبت سفارش ترجمه نیز روی دکلمه قرمز رنگ کلیک نمایید. سفارش ترجمه نیازمند زمان بوده و ترجمه این مقاله آماده نمیباشد و پس از اتمام ترجمه، فایل ورد تایپ شده قابل دانلود خواهد بود.
فهرست مطالب:
Abstract
Keywords
1. Introduction
1.1. Psychopathic Boldness
1.2. Psychopathic Boldness and its relation to narcissism
1.3. The current study
2. Method
2.1. Participants and procedure
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Triarchic psychopathy measure (TriPM; Patrick, 2010)
2.2.2. Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE; Rosenberg, 1965)
2.2.3. Narcissism factors: 2- and 3-factor models
2.2.4. International personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory – 120 item version (IPIP-NEO-120; Maples, Guan, Carter & Miller, 2014)
2.2.5. Elemental psychopathy assessment-validity items (EPA; Lynam et al., 2011)
3. Results
3.1. Zero-order correlations
3.2. Criterion validity
4. Discussion
4.1. Limitations and conclusions
References
قسمتی از مقاله انگلیسی:
1. Introduction
Psychopathy is a multidimensional personality disorder described by traits related to interpersonal antagonism (e.g., callousness; deceitfulness) and disinhibition (e.g., impulsivity) that are associated with problematic interpersonal relationships (e.g., Weiss, Lavner & Miller, 2018) and maladaptive behavior (e.g., antisocial behavior; Hare & Neumann, 2008). Although psychopathy is one of the most studied and well-validated personality disorders, debate remains regarding how to optimally define its nature and scope. Specifically, there is debate regarding the necessity and sufficiency of its components (e.g., Lilienfeld et al., 2012; Lynam & Miller, 2012; Miller & Lynam, 2012). While theorists generally agree that features of interpersonal antagonism and disinhibition are necessary, the role of fearless dominance/ boldness1 (e.g., stress immunity, social potency, and thrill/adventure seeking; Patrick, Fowles & Krueger, 2009), remains contested (see Lilienfeld et al., 2012, Miller & Lynam, 2012). Proponents argue that it has been included in numerous classical descriptions of psychopathy (e.g., Cleckley, 1941), may serve as a mask for maladaptive features, and/or may bear curvilinear or interactive relations to externalizing outcomes (Blonigen, 2013; Lilienfeld et al., 2012). Others, however, contend that it has not been included in all classic conceptions (i.e., Karpman, 1941; McCord & McCord, 1964), that its necessity is questionable due to the limited relations it bears to important outcomes (i.e., externalizing outcomes; Miller & Lynam, 2012; Sleep, Weiss, Lynam & Miller, 2019), either in curvilinear or interactive fashion (Weiss et al., 2019), and absence of evidence it works to mask other maladaptive traits.