مشخصات مقاله:
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
آموزش تست نرم افزار: یک طرح مطالعاتی اصولی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Software-testing education: A systematic literature mapping
کلمات کلیدی مقاله:
تست نرم افزار، آموزش تست نرم افزار، آموزش مهندسی نرم افزار، تحقیقات آموزش و پرورش، مرور سیستماتیک ادبیات، نقشه برداری منظم ادبیات
مناسب برای رشته های دانشگاهی زیر:
مهندسی کامپیوتر
مناسب برای گرایش های دانشگاهی زیر:
مهندسی نرم افزار
وضعیت مقاله انگلیسی و ترجمه:
مقاله انگلیسی را میتوانید به صورت رایگان با فرمت PDF با کلیک بر روی دکمه آبی، دانلود نمایید. برای ثبت سفارش ترجمه نیز روی دکلمه قرمز رنگ کلیک نمایید. سفارش ترجمه نیازمند زمان بوده و ترجمه این مقاله آماده نمیباشد و پس از اتمام ترجمه، فایل ورد تایپ شده قابل دانلود خواهد بود.
فهرست مطالب:
Abstract
Context
Objective
Method
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
1. Introduction
2. Background and related work
2.1. Software-testing education in universities versus training in industry
2.2. Related works: secondary studies in software engineering education
3. Design and execution of the SLM
3.1. Goal and research questions
3.2. The search process: selecting the source engines and search keywords
3.3. Application of inclusion/exclusion criteria and voting
3.4. Final pool of the primary studies
3.5. Development of the systematic map
3.6. Data extraction process and data synthesis
4. Findings of the SLM
4.1. RQ 1-classification of studies by contribution types
4.1.1. RQ 1.1-contribution types and their frequencies
4.1.2. RQ 1.2: clusters of papers: on similar topics and by the same team of authors
4.2. RQ 2-classification of studies by research method types
4.3. RQ 3- data sources for evaluations
4.4. RQ 4- research questions or hypothesis, studied in the papers
4.5. RQ 5- technical aspects of testing: type of test activities covered in the course(s)
4.6. RQ 6- scale of the educational setting under study
4.7. RQ 7- different approaches to testing education: offering separate testing courses or integrating testing in other courses
4.8. RQ 8-theories and theory use in software-testing education
4.9. RQ 9-empirical evidence/findings
4.9.1. RQ 9.1- challenges in testing education
4.9.2. RQ 9.2- insights, observations, and recommendations for testing education
4.9.3. Relating challenges and insights
5. Discussions
5.1. Recommendations for educators
5.2. Suggestions for further education research in this area
5.3. Potential threats to validity
6. Conclusions and future work
Pool of studies in the systematic literature mapping
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Declaration of Competing Interest
Acknowledgment
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
قسمتی از مقاله انگلیسی:
1. Introduction
“Software is eating the world” (Andreessen, 2018). In other words, software systems have penetrated almost all industries and all aspects of our personal and professional lives. Furthermore, many industrial sources are reporting that software systems are getting increasingly complex (Khushu, 2019; Algaze, 2017; Etheredge, 2018). With the increasing complexity and scale of software systems, there is an ever-increasing demand for sophisticated and cost-effective software quality assurance. Software testing is a fundamental, and also the most widespread, activity to assure the quality of software systems. A 2013 study by Cambridge University (Britton et al., 2013) reported that the global cost of locating and removing defects from software systems has risen to $312 billion annually, and removing defects comprises, on average, about half of the development costs of a typical software project. To meet the ever-growing demand for cost-effective software testing, there is the increasing need for a highly-skilled software testing work-force in the industry. But in the non-peerreviewed literature (grey-literature) such as online blogs and articles, many industrial sources are also reporting the shortage of software testers, e.g., (ComputerWeekly, 2019, Murrary, 2019, uTest Community Management 2010). Furthermore, in the context of software testing talent shortage, it is often recruiting “quality” software testers (i.e., with the right skillset), not just recruiting “quantity” (number of people available in the job market) (Baker, 2019) that is the challenge.