دانلود رایگان مقاله بررسی، مقایسه و چالش های تحقیق پروتکل های کاربردی اینترنت اشیا برای کشاورزی هوشمند – سال 2020
مشخصات مقاله:
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
بررسی، مقایسه و چالش های تحقیق پروتکل های کاربردی اینترنت اشیا برای کشاورزی هوشمند
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming
کلمات کلیدی مقاله:
کشاورزی هوشمند، اینترنت اشیاء، پروتکل های برنامه IoT، پروتکل های پیام رسانی IoT، انتشار – اشتراک
مناسب برای رشته های دانشگاهی زیر:
مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات
مناسب برای گرایش های دانشگاهی زیر:
اینترنت و شبکه های گسترده
وضعیت مقاله انگلیسی و ترجمه:
مقاله انگلیسی را میتوانید به صورت رایگان با فرمت PDF با کلیک بر روی دکمه آبی، دانلود نمایید. برای ثبت سفارش ترجمه نیز روی دکلمه قرمز رنگ کلیک نمایید. سفارش ترجمه نیازمند زمان بوده و ترجمه این مقاله آماده نمیباشد و پس از اتمام ترجمه، فایل ورد تایپ شده قابل دانلود خواهد بود.
فهرست مطالب:
1. Introduction
2. Basic IoT application protocols
2.1. Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT)
2.2. Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
2.3. Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
2.4. Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP)
2.5. Data Distribution Service (DDS)
2.6. Representational State Transfer Hypertext Transfer Protocol (REST HTTP)
2.7. WebSocket
3. Comparison of IoT application protocols
3.1. Latency
3.2. Required bandwidth and throughput
3.3. Energy/Power consumption
3.4. Preferences in recent IoT applications’ development
4. On the use of IoT application protocols in smart farming
4.1. Review of IoT implementations in smart farming
4.1.1. Simple, small scale applications
4.1.2. Full prototypes for medium and large-scale applications
4.2. Evaluation of IoT application layer protocols in smart farming implementations
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
Declaration of Competing Interest
Acknowledgment
References
قسمتی از مقاله انگلیسی:
1. Introduction
Emerging Internet of Things (IoT) technologies offer a great potential for novel solutions and smarter application development that can improve all aspects of the agricultural sector. Data collection has been made easier during the last decade due to recent advances of communication networks and protocols, mainly on the lower layers, i.e., the physical, link and network layers. However, in addition to these, the upper layer protocols are of major importance for efficient data collection and sharing. In the context of IoT, application layer protocols mainly refer to the lower part of the TCP/IP stack model’s application layer that corresponds to the OSI session layer and they are also commonly referred as messaging protocols. The two main categories are the protocols that follow the request/response model, and those that follow the publish/subscribe model. They can either be used in parts only of the IoT communication architecture or in the whole of it, meaning that while an IoT application protocol can be used for communication between the IoT devices and an IoT gateway, other protocols may be used between the gateway and the cloud or the cloud and the end user. Similarly to all IoT application frameworks, smart farming applications are based on IoT application layer protocols for data transfer. Though, the nature and diversity of IoT agricultural applications which span a wide range of requirements both in the type of data and the environments that the IoT devices are installed raise major challenges related to the volume, variety, veracity and velocity of the data. In this context, this work is building upon recent research efforts and related surveys [1-14] to include all the advancements and new evaluation results of testing IoT application protocols during the past three years, so that to provide a fresh and consistent basis that will allow comparison of the major ones among them: the Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol, the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), the Data Distribution Service (DDS) protocol, the Representational State Transfer Hypertext Transfer Protocol (REST HTTP) and the WebSocket protocol.
