مشخصات مقاله:
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
ماهیت نظریه در سیستم های اطلاعات
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
THE NATURE OF THEORY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS
کلمات کلیدی مقاله:
نظریه، طبقه بندی نظریاتی، ساختار نظریه، انتظام در سیستم های اطلاعات، فلسفه ی علم، فلسفه ی علموم اجتماعی، نظریه های تفسیر گرا، نظریه ی طراحی، علم طراحی، توضیح، پیش بینی، علیت، تعمیم
مناسب برای رشته های دانشگاهی زیر:
مدیریت
مناسب برای گرایش های دانشگاهی زیر:
مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات
وضعیت مقاله انگلیسی و ترجمه:
مقاله انگلیسی را میتوانید به صورت رایگان با فرمت PDF با کلیک بر روی دکمه آبی، دانلود نمایید. برای ثبت سفارش ترجمه نیز روی دکلمه قرمز رنگ کلیک نمایید. سفارش ترجمه نیازمند زمان بوده و ترجمه این مقاله آماده نمیباشد و پس از اتمام ترجمه، فایل ورد تایپ شده قابل دانلود خواهد بود.
قسمتی از مقاله انگلیسی:
Abstract The aim of this research essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in Information Systems. Despite the importance of theory, questions relating to its form and structure are neglected in comparison with questions relating to epistemology. The essay addresses issues of causality, explanation, prediction, and generalization that underlie an understanding of theory. A taxonomy is proposed that classifies information systems theories with respect to the manner in which four central goals are addressed: analysis, explanation, prediction, and prescription. Five interrelated types of theory are distinguished: (1) theory for analyzing, (2) theory for explaining, (3) theory for predicting, (4) theory for explaining and predicting, and (5) theory for design and action. Examples illustrate the nature of each theory type. The applicability of the taxonomy is demonstrated by classifying a sample of journal articles. The paper contributes by showing that multiple views of theory exist and by exposing the assumptions underlying different viewpoints. In addition, it is suggested that the type of theory under development can influence the choice of an epistemological approach. Support is given for the legitimacy and value of each theory type. The building of integrated bodies of theory that encompass all theory types is advocated. Introduction The aim of this essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in the discipline of Information Systems. There are a number of grounds for believing that this meta-theoretical exploration is both necessary and timely. Calls continue for “good theory” in IS (Watson 2001) and the development of our “own” theory (Weber 2003). Despite the recognition of the need for theory development, however, there is limited discussion in IS forums of what theory means in IS and what form contributions to knowledge can take.
Introduction
The aim of this essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in the discipline of Information Systems. There are a number of grounds for believing that this meta-theoretical exploration is both necessary and timely. Calls continue for “good theory” in IS (Watson 2001) and the development of our “own” theory (Weber 2003). Despite the recognition of the need for theory development, however, there is limited discussion in IS forums of what theory means in IS and what form contributions to knowledge can take.
